|
Things I Am Certain Of...Part 1 Pastor Bill Farrow |

Home | Church Info | Members | Doctrine | Studies | Missionaries | Youth | Articles |
|
The
Gospel is a curious thing. The more you think about it, the more there is
to think about! I have thought fairly extensively about it recently and am
at a place where I willing to make some conclusions about what has been on
my mind. First,
I am convinced that I am in an extreme minority in my view of the Gospel.
There are few who agree completely with me, or rather, I should say, with
whom I completely agree. This leads me to a place of real humility. On the
one hand, it is an extremely perilous and intimidating thing to be ''out
there" in an area that few have been willing to venture into. On the
other hand; I see perfect indication in the Word of God to lead me to
believe that this is exactly the kind of situation a thoughtful believer
would find himself in at this time in history. All
of this being said, my position is firming up and the need for meekness
and humility grows with each passing day as I grow more and more certain
of what the Bible teaches about the true Gospel. I must take extreme care
to bathe myself in the Word of God and in the Word of God alone. It must
be my sole source for my conclusions. This is not to say that logic and
human thought and commentary are the enemy. Rather to say that they must
be carefully subjected to what the Word actually says. All
of this being the case, there are some things of which I am now certain.
These are in no certain order, just as I wrote them down. 1. Christ
Died To Pay For Sins and He Actually Accomplished His Goal. Christ
came into the world to save sinners. That is certain and very few who call
themselves Biblical Christians would argue the point. What is less clear
for most people is that Jesus did, indeed, actually do what He set out to
do. When Christ gave up the Ghost at the end of His suffering the work of
bearing sins was done and fully accomplished. Christ paid a penalty, a
ransom to God that fully satisfied the Father regarding the owing of that
penalty. The penalty is thus owing or outstanding no longer. It cannot be
if the sacrifice of Christ was effective. The
truth of the matter is that either it was effective or it was not
effective. If it was effective, then it was perfectly and fully effective.
The only thing that could have made it less than fully effective is if if
was not intended to be so. There is absolutely no indication in the
Scripture that I am aware of that would lead me to think that Christ's
death was any less than perfectly effective, completely achieving what He
set out to accomplish. If He set out to save sinners, then that is what He
did; completely and absolutely. Further,
if Christ satisfied the Father, then He did that perfectly and completely
as well. If the Father is satisfied, He must be satisfied with regard to
something. The object of that satisfaction must be something with which He
was un-satisfied prior to the sacrifice of Christ. If it was the death of
Christ that satisfied the Father, then He was satisfied and the cross and
that satisfaction ought and should be spoken and thought of as fully
accomplished in time and space from that point onward. If
God was satisfied at the cross, then what could render Him
''unsatisfied" once again? Orly one thing, so far as I can see could
possibly effect such a thing. That would be if the requirement after the
cross was different than it was before. It is clear that before the cross
the requirement of God for entry into heaven was absolute and complete
righteousness with no lack of that righteousness or any unsatisfied sin
past, present or future. If the standard remains the same then the
satisfaction remains intact. The only condition that could alter this is
if, somehow, the standard changes, and becomes something that is dependent
on human behavior. Some
would say, though perhaps not in so many words, that is precisely what
happens. The issue after the cross is not the absence of absolute
righteousness but, rather, what have you done with Jesus? Of course, the
problem with this is that the Bible nowhere even hints at a shift in the
standard by which God measures man. It is the same after the cross as it
was before. God requires perfect righteouness to enter heaven, no less. In
order to effect this, Christ had to die to pay for sin, thus satisfying
God's righteous justice on the part of the elect. (Note: this is not all
that is required for salvation - there is still the matter of the
necessary righteousness, as being cleansed of sin is not sufficient to
commend men to God - but that remains to be discussed later). I am
certain that Christ, in His death, fully satisfied the Father on the part
of the sins of the elect. Of this I am certain! |