Who Knew What And When Did they Know It?

Pastor Bill Farrow

Home | Church Info | Members | Doctrine | Studies | Missionaries | Youth | Articles

 

[19] because what may be known of God is manifest in them, 
for God has shown it to them.

Romans 1:19

There is much talk about today concerning who knew what about September 11th and when they knew it. All sorts of stories and allegations are coming forward about so and so who warned us about this and another who warned us about something else. Some insist that there was enough information around to have avoided the catastrophes all together. Others point out that we need to remember that hindsight is always 20-20 seeing the evidence after the fact is far easier than putting it together beforehand.

Whatever your view, it is clear that if there was, indeed, prior knowledge then culpability for the attacks extends beyond the perpetrators to those who allowed it to happen. If they knew, then they could have prevented, or at least lessened the effect of, the tragedy. This would truly be a most heinous of crimes deserving of quick and severe punishment.

Not entirely unrelated is the idea set before us in Romans 1:19. The verse is speaking, in part, about what the unredeemed know and when they knew it.

Romans 1 makes the case that, ultimately, the lost are responsible  for their condition and deserving of their punishment because they knew the truth and did not respond properly to it.

In our culture, knowledge is a prerequisite for culpability. One is not responsible for an act or an outcome if one did not have knowledge enough to reasonably foresee the results of their actions. We assign recognize responsibility when such knowledge is absent, but should reasonably have been present had the individual acted as all normal, responsible people would act in similar circumstances. Negligence is no excuse for failure to prevent or abstain from dangerous or criminal activity. Nor is ignorance of the Law regarded as an excuse if they should reasonably have known their responsibility under the Law.

This passage demonstrates that all men, without exception, have knowledge of God. God Himself "shows" this information to men. This indicates that men are aware of it and understand its implications.

This is the basis (part of it anyway) for condemnation. The universal rejection of this knowledge is a significant demonstration of lostness of man. This universal depravity demonstrates the truth of John's assertion (John 1:5) that men are in darkness that only the Word can penetrate.

That men are culpable before God because of their rejection of the Gospel is certainly true. However, this is added condemnation. As John told us is John 3 men were condemned already before any specific revelation of the Gospel ever came their way. This condemnation is due, in part, to this knowledge of God we see spoken of here in Romans 1. Because men know of God, His power and their responsibility to Him; and because they fail to respond to it properly; they stand condemned. 

We should note that there is also the matter of the imputed sin of Adam to his progeny to weigh in any consideration of why mankind stands guilty before God. But that is a topic for another day.

Care To Respond?