Passage To
Study:
John 6:30-40
[30] Therefore they said to Him, “What sign will You perform then, that we may see it and believe You? What work will You do? [31] “Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’” [32] Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, Moses did not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from heaven. [33] “For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” [34] Then they said to Him, “Lord, give us this bread always.” [35] And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. [36] “But I said to you that you have seen Me and yet do not believe. [37] “All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out. [38] “For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. [39] “This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day. [40] “And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.” What are the facts of the passage?:
What do those facts mean?: It
is almost comical that Christ has just rebuked them for seeking after
signs and they ask for another. It is the mentality of the Law that is the
problem. Their concern with rights and signs prevented them from seeing
the obvious truth of Christ's situation. This can happen to us all. It is
a failing of human nature to want to know the whys and wherefores of
anyone who is contradicting our understanding of the truth. Care must and
should be exercised to be sure that we are open to all that God desires to
say and Rat just to what we want to hear. They
make much the same appeal that
the Samaritan Woman made. The implication is that Christ is not qualified
and they are. They are appealing to the authority of tradition. They can't
be wrong because they are Moses' disciples and that would mean that Moses
is wrong. Jesus
tells them that they misunderstand what God's dealings with Moses were all
about. This end runs their protest. Their argument is invalid because they
misunderstand what the intent of the provision of manna was. It was not
the bread from heaven, it pointed to the bread from heaven, the Lord Jesus
Himself. Just
a note about the choice of grammar in the last phrase in verse 33. Christ
doesn't say that He gave His life for the world, but that He gave
His life to the world. I don't know how significant the difference
us, but I cannot believe that it is insignificant. The difference is that
the later gives the sense of the giving of a gift. Further thought is
needed to make sense of the matter. We
just note that the theme of hearing and seeing and yet not believing is
continued. It suggests the question of how someone does, indeed, believe.
This question is addressed next. How do those facts apply to my life?: This is central to all meaningful theology, especially that regarding soteriology. The pillar of God's role in salvation is the foundational support of all other theological thought. What should I do in response?: Incorporate it into my thinking as consistently as possible. |
| Day |
| 27 |

| I Am The Bread Of Life |
Home | Church Info | Members | Doctrine | Studies | Missionaries | Youth | John Home |