|
19
because what may be known of
God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
20
For since the creation of the
world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the
things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they
are without excuse,
21
because, although they knew
God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became
futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.
22
Professing to be wise, they
became fools,
23
and changed the glory of the
incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and
four-footed animals and creeping things.
24
Therefore God also gave them
up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their
bodies among themselves,
Four cautions are in order in regard to
spurious teachings about God’s wrath. First, we should be aware
of the great appeal to the natural man of such concepts as unconscious
soul sleep and universalism, both of which deny God’s judgment and
wrath. Second, we should recognize the pervasive influence of
Christian liberalism, which views God as being too loving to condemn
anyone and necessarily denies the authenticity of the texts that state
otherwise. Third, we should realize that religious groups that
deny God’s wrath are frequently cultic. And fourth, we should
remember that denial of God’s wrath removes the purpose and motivation
for witnessing, namely; the God-glorifying salvation of unbelievers from
sin and hell.
Bible teacher R. A. Torrey wisely wrote:
“Shallow views of sin and of God’s holiness, and of the glory of Jesus
Christ and His claims upon us, lie at the bottom of weak theories of the
doom of the impenitent. When we see sin in all its hideousness and
enormity, the Holiness of God in all its perfection, and the glory of
Jesus Christ in all its infinity, nothing but a doctrine that those who
persist in the choice of sin, who love darkness rather than light, and
who persist in the rejection of the Son of God, shall endure everlasting
anguish, will satisfy the demands of our own moral intuitions.… The more
closely men walk with God and the more devoted they become to His
service, the more likely they are to believe this doctrine”.
Throughout the history of the church,
faithful men of God have understood and proclaimed the biblical truths
that God is a God of justice and judgment and that His wrath is against
all unbelief and ungodliness. That knowledge was the great motivation
for their tireless service in winning the lost. John Knox pleaded before
God, “Give me Scotland or I die.” As the young Hudson Taylor
contemplated the fate of the unreached multitudes of China, he earnestly
prayed, “I feel that I cannot go on living unless I do something for
China.” Upon landing in India, Henry Martyn said, “Here I am in the
midst of heathen midnight and savage oppression. Now, my dear Lord, let
me burn out for Thee.” Adoniram Judson, the famed missionary to Burma,
spent long, tiresome years translating the Bible for that people. He was
eventually put into prison because of his work, and while there his wife
died. After being released, he contracted a serious disease that sapped
what little energy he had left. Nevertheless he prayed, “Lord, let me
finish my work. Spare me long enough to put the saving Word into the
hands of the people.” James Chalmers, a Scottish missionary to the South
Sea Islands, was so burdened for the lost that someone wrote of him, “In
Christ’s service he endured hardness, hunger, shipwreck and exhausting
toil, and did it all joyfully. He risked his life a thousand times and
finally was clubbed to death, beheaded, and eaten by men whose friend he
was and whom he sought to enlighten.” Although he was unable to go
overseas, Robert Arthington enabled countless others to go. By working
hard and living frugally he managed to give over $500,000 to the work of
foreign missions. He testified, “Gladly would I make the floor my bed, a
box my chair, and another box my table, rather than that men should
perish for want of the knowledge of Christ.”
Those faithful saints, and many others
like them, have clearly understood the wrath and the judgment of God and
the consequent horror of men dying without Christ. Without such
understanding there is no basis for evangelism. If men are not lost,
hopeless, and incapable of glorifying God apart from Christ, there is no
reason for them to be saved by Him.
The biblical order in any gospel
presentation is always first the warning of danger and then the way of
escape, first the judgment on sin and then the means of pardon, first
the message of condemnation and then the offer of forgiveness, first the
bad news of guilt and then the good news of grace. The whole message and
purpose of the loving, redeeming grace of God offering eternal life
through Jesus Christ rests upon the reality of man’s universal guilt of
abandoning God and thereby being under His sentence of eternal
condemnation and death.
Consistent with that approach, the main
body of Romans begins with 1:18, a clear affirmation of God’s wrath
“against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men.” As the apostle
points out in his Ephesian letter, all unbelievers are “by nature
children of wrath” (2:3), born unto God’s wrath as their natural
inheritance in fallen mankind. With the Fall, God’s smile turned to a
frown. Moses rhetorically asked God, “Who understands the power of
Thine anger, and Thy fury, according to the fear that is due Thee?”
(Ps. 90:11).
The Puritan writer Thomas Watson said,
“As the love of God makes every bitter thing sweet, so the curse of God
makes every sweet thing bitter”. A more contemporary writer, George
Rogers, said that God’s “righteous anger never rises, never abates: it
is always at flood tide in the presence of sin because He is
unchangeably and inflexibly righteous”.
How could One who delights only in what
is pure and lovely not loathe what is impure and ugly? How could He who
is infinitely holy disregard sin, which by its very nature violates that
holiness? How could He who loves righteousness not hate and act severely
against all unrighteousness? How could He who is the sum of all
excellency look with complacency on virtue and vice equally? He
cannot do those things, because He is holy, just, and good. Wrath is
the only just response a perfectly holy God could make to unholy men.
Righteous wrath therefore is every bit as much an element of God’s
divine perfection as any other of His attributes, as Paul makes quite
clear in Romans 9:22-23.
Paul is determined for us to know that
before we can understand the grace of God we must first understand His
wrath, that before we can understand the meaning of the death of Christ
we must first understand why man’s sin made that death necessary; that
before we can begin to comprehend how loving, merciful, and gracious God
is we must first see how rebellious, sinful, and guilty unbelieving
mankind is.
Tragically, even many evangelicals have
come to soft-pedal the theme of God’s wrath and judgment. Even so much
as a minimum mention of hell has been quietly removed from much
preaching. Wrath, when mentioned at all, is frequently depersonalized,
as if somehow it is worked out automatically by some deistic operation
in which God Himself is not directly involved.
Many are inclined to wonder if man
really deserves such a harsh fate. After all, no person asks to be born.
Why then, they surmise, should a person who had nothing to do with his
own birth spend eternity in hell for being born sinful? The question,
“Why is everyone born under God’s wrath and condemnation?”
deserves attention. It is those very questions that Paul answers in
Romans 1:19-23, where he explains why God is justified in His wrath
against all sinful men.
Some people, even some pagans, have
recognized God’s right to be angry at man’s sin. During the priesthood
of Eli, while the young Samuel still served under him in the Temple,
Israel had reached a low spiritual level. There was religious tokenism
but little genuine faith or obedience. Thinking to use the ark of the
covenant much as a magic charm to assure their victory, Israel took it
into battle against the Philistines. But Israel not only lost 30,000 men
in the battle but also lost the ark of the covenant to the enemy. After
suffering numerous disastrous and embarrassing experiences with the ark,
the Philistines decided to return it to Israel. When they returned it,
they sent along a guilt offering to assuage the anger of God against
them. Although their understanding of Israel’s God was faulty and the
offering they presented to Him was thoroughly pagan, they nevertheless
recognized His power and His right to judge and punish them as being
guilty of violating His honor (see 1 Sam. 4-6).
When Achan stole some of the booty from
Jericho, all of which was to be given to the Tabernacle treasury, his
sin caused Israel to be defeated at Ai. When his disobedience was
exposed, he readily confessed, saying, “Truly, I have sinned against
the Lord, the God Israel” (Josh. 7:20).
God is absolutely just, never condemning
unless condemnation is deserved. Achan knew God’s law given through
Moses and he knew of God’s special ban on taking the spoil from Jericho
for personal use. The pagan Philistines, on the other hand, knew only of
God’s tremendous power. But Achan and the Philistines both knew they
were guilty before God and deserved His wrath. In Romans 1:19-23, Paul
gives four reasons why they and every person born except Jesus Christ,
fully deserve to be under God’s wrath. Those reasons may be identified
as God’s revelation, man’s rejection, man’s rationalization, and man’s
religion.
I need to
emulate the great passion for souls displayed some of the great men of
God of the past – and which was ultimately demonstrated by God Himself
in the sending of His only begotten Son! |