|
28
And even as they did not like
to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind,
to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled
with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness,
maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness;
they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent,
proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful;
32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who
practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but
also approve of those who practice them.
Murder -
“The taking of human life with
premeditated malice by a person of a sane mind.” This is necessary to
constitute murder now, but the word used here denotes all manslaughter,
or taking human life, except what occurs as the punishment of crime. It
is scarcely necessary to show that this was common among the Gentiles.
It has prevailed in all communities, but it was particularly prevalent
in Rome. It is necessary only to refer the reader to the common events
in the Roman history of assassinations, deaths by poison, and the
destruction of slaves. But in a special manner the charge was properly
alleged against them, on account of the inhuman contests of the
gladiators in the amphitheaters. These were common at Rome, and
constituted a favorite amusement with the people. Originally captives,
slaves, and criminals were trained up for combat; but it afterward
became common for even Roman citizens to engage in these bloody combats,
and Nero at one show exhibited no less than four hundred senators and
six hundred knights as gladiators.
The fondness for this bloody spectacle
continued until the reign of Constantine the Great, the first Christian
emperor, by whom they were abolished about six hundred years after the
original institution. “Several hundred, perhaps several thousand,
victims were annually slaughtered in the great cities of the empire.” As
an instance of what might occur in this inhuman spectacle, we may refer
to what took place on such an occasion in the reign of Probus (A.D.
281). During his
triumph, near 700 gladiators were reserved to shed each other’s blood
for the amusement of the Roman people. But “disdaining to shed their
blood for the amusement of the populace, they killed their keepers,
broke from their place of confinement, and filled the streets of Rome
with blood and confusion.” With such views and with such spectacles
before them, it is not wonderful that murder was regarded as a matter of
little consequence, and hence, this crime prevailed throughout the
world.
Debate -
Our word debate does not commonly imply
evil. It denotes commonly discussion for elucidating truth; or for
maintaining a proposition, as the debates in Parliament, etc. But the
word in the original meant also contention, strife, altercation,
connected with anger and heated zeal; (Rom. 13:13; 1 Cor. 1:11; 3:3; 2
Cor. 12:20; Gal. 5:20; Phil 1:15; 1 Tim. 6:4; Titus 3:9). This
contention and strife would, of course, follow from malice and
covetousness, etc.
Deceit -
This denotes fraud, falsehood, etc. That
this was common is also plain. The Cretans are testified by one of the
Greek poets to have been always liars. (Titus 1:12). Juvenal charges the
same thing on the Romans. “What,” says he, “should I do at Rome? I
cannot lie.” Intimating that if he were there, it would follow, of
course, that he would be expected to be false. The same thing is still
true. Writers on India tell us that the word of a Hindu even under oath
is not to be regarded; and the same thing occurs in many pagan
countries. It is even the case in our own as deceit becomes the norm and
the accepted, even preferred thing.
Malignity -
This word signifies here, not malignity
in general, but that particular species of it which consists in
misinterpreting the words or actions of others, or putting the worst
construction on their conduct. We might translate it “thinking evil of
others.
Whisperers -
Those who secretly, and in a sly manner,
by hints and inuendoes, detract from others, or excite suspicion of
them. It does not mean those who openly speak of evil of or tear down
the reputation, but that more dangerous class who give hints of evil in
others, who affect great knowledge, and communicate the evil report
under an injunction of secrecy, knowing that it will be divulged. This
class of people abounds everywhere, and there is scarcely any one more
dangerous to the peace or happiness of society.
ROMANS 1:30
Backbiters -
Those who active speak evil of others,
slander, or speak ill of those who are absent. Whisperers declare
secretly, and with great reserve, the supposed faults of others.
Backbiters proclaim them publicly and avowedly.
Haters of God -
There is no charge which can be brought
against people more severe than this. It is the highest possible crime;
yet it is a charge which the conduct of people will abundantly justify,
and the truth of which all those experience that are brought to see
their true character. To an awakened sinner there is often nothing more
plain and painful than that he is a hater of God. His heart rises up
against Him, and his Law, and his plan of saving people; and he deeply
feels that nothing can subdue this but the mighty power of the Holy One.
This is a charge which is not infrequently brought against people in the
Bible; (see John 7:7; 15:18, 24-25; 3:19-20). Surely, if this be the
native character of man, then it is “far gone from original
righteousness.” No more striking proof of depravity could be given; and
in no creed or confession of faith is there a more painful and
humiliating representation given of human wickedness, than in this
declaration of an inspired apostle, that people are by nature
HATERS OF
GOD.
Despiteful -
This word denotes those who abuse, or
treat with unkindness or disdain, those who are present. Whisperers and
backbiters are those who speak against those who are absent.
Proud -
Pride is well understood. It is defined
as an inordinate self-esteem; an unreasonable conceit of one’s
superiority in talents, beauty, wealth, accomplishments, etc. (Webster).
Of the existence of this everywhere, there is abundant proof. And it was
particularly striking among the ancients. The sect of the Stoics was
distinguished for it, and this was the general character of their
philosophers. People will be proud where they suppose none are superior;
and it is only the religion that reveals a great and infinite God, and
that teaches that all blessings are his gift, and that he has given us
the station which we occupy, that will produce true humility. We may
add, that the system of paganism did not disclose the wickedness of the
heart, and that rids was a main reason why they were elevated in
self-esteem. If there is a national sin in our country, a great argument
could be made that it is pride. Pride leads to all manner of other sins
– from self-reliance and independence, to selfish ambition.
Boasters -
Those who attribute to themselves and
glory in that which did not originate with them. This is closely
connected with pride. A man who has an inordinate self-conceit, will not
be slow to proclaim his own merits to those around him. We ought to note
that God is the author, ultimately, of all that is good in and around
us, and that fact alone leaves man with no cause for boasting. this is
the root problem with the Arminian view of salvation – it leaves cause
for men to boast in themselves – they were smart enough or willing
enough to choose Christ, implying that the ability or wisdom originated
with them.
Inventors of evil things -
This doubtless refers to their seeking to
find out new arts or plans to practice evil; new devices to gratify
their lusts and passions; new forms of luxury, and vice, etc. So intent
were they on practicing evil, so resolved to gratify their passions,
that the mind was excited to discover new modes of gratification. In
cities of luxury and vice, this has always been done. Vices change their
form, people become satiated, and they are obliged to resort to some new
form. The passions cease to be gratified with old forms of indulgence,
and consequently people are obliged to resort to new devices to pamper
their appetites, and to rekindle their dying passions to a flame. This
was eminently true of ancient Rome; a place where all the arts of
luxury, all the devices of passion, all the designs of splendid
gratification, were called forth to excite and pamper the evil passions
of people. Their splendid entertainments, their games, their theaters,
their sports - cruel and bloody - were little else than new and
ever-varying inventions of evil things to gratify the desires of lust
and of pride.
Disobedient to parents -
This expresses the idea that they did not
show to parents that honor, respect, and attention which was due. This
has been a crime of paganism in every age; and though among the Romans
the duty of honoring parents was enjoined by the laws, yet it is not
improbable that the duty was often violated, and that parents were
treated with great neglect and even contempt. “Disobedience to parents
was punished by the Jewish Law with death, and with the Hindus it is
attended with the loss of the child’s inheritance. The ancient Greeks
considered the neglect of it to be extremely impious, and attended with
the most certain effects of divine vengeance. The feelings of pride and
haughtiness would lead to disregard of parents. It might also be felt
that to provide for them when aged and infirm was a burden; and hence,
there would arise disregard for their wants, and probably open
opposition to their wishes, as being the demands of petulance and age.
It has been one characteristic of paganism every where, that it leaves
children to treat their parents with neglect. Among the Sandwich
islanders it was customary, when a parent was old, infirm, and sick
beyond the hope of recovery, for his own children to bury him alive; and
it has been the common custom in India for children to leave their aged
parents to perish on the banks of the Ganges. |